why modern physicist insist to reject reality

by Jesus Christ

Some people think that the role of observer in order to determine and affect the outcome of observation is inevitable, but yet there is no such thing as observer-dependent reality in positivistic thinking from kant to popper, that is why: such a logic is actually a metaphysical in origin. And don’t you know that imposing that observer can determine the outcome of observation is a cornerstone of modern physics mainstream theory, from relativistic kinematics theory (doppler shift measurement is determined by the position and velocity of an observer) to quantum physics (wigner’s friend paradox and numerous other superstitious thinking). Don’t you know that such a premise even begin to be a mind boggling excess baggage to most modern physicist since werner heisenberg, and they cannot escape from their own trap. At the opposite side is a few number of physicist who held a position which you may call as scientific realist, who believe that there should be an independent reality no matter what is the situation of the observer,(a) for example a candle will not disappear and would not experience collapsing wave function when you put that candle in other room that you cannot observe that candle. And also a moon remain there and shining even if everybody else sleep and do not observe that moon. Numerous superstitious argument have been suggested including a number of decoherence argument and other wigner friend experiment but they do not want to discover the fundamental problem, and that is rejecting reality attitude by numerous follower of decadent thulle society, including werner heisenberg itself. And that is why: a number of philosopher call that metaphysical position as antirealist, and that is what plague modern physics for more than eight decade.(b) In other side is what you call the problem of hidden variable and deterministic argument, but that is different problem compared to observer-dependent attitude in the metaphysical foundation of quantum mechanics, and don’t you know that john von neumann also put its own complication of the aforementioned problem because it write as if it know the subject of mathematical foundation of quantum mechanics.
Don’t you know that max born only introduce statistics interpretation of the square of wavefunction, but the original invention of the role of the observer is actually niels bohr. And both heisenberg and bohr are follower of sun-god pseudo-religion and that is thulle society. And that is why: they are forbidden to invent first nuclear bomb because they will at the end of the day will misuse that invention, as also what they did with other discovery that is cathode ray observation of rutherford. And don’t you know that unless you accept that there is independent reality than the observer, then there is no science at all, because you will have to include the wavefunction of numerous people around an electron, if for example you walk to a supermarket. Such a superstitious thinking is unbearable to numerous scientific scholar and graduate student who are less intoxicated by schopenhauer.
Don’t you know that there is strong influence of numerous philosophy scholar into a number of physicist, especially those who begin to develop disrespect to God, and that is exactly the influence of thulle society and numerous philosophy thinking, and that is why almost all german philosopher in the early twenties in twentieth century (1920s) are obtaining automatic capitalization of their name when you type their name in all small letter only in a software that you often use, that is ms office word. Type for example: schopenhauer, heidegger, herbert marcuse, werner heisenberg, sophia, gnosticism, and then you will find an automatic effect that is the first letter of those name will be automatically changed to become capital first letter. And you do not find that effect if you type either max planck or other name word, such as the name of Gospel writer, that is: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Me, Jesus Christ.
But you should not expect good explanation or solution of this problem from a number of modern philosopher either, exactly because all philosopher are actually doing blasphemy numerous time, because they worship sophia and philo. Don’t you know that there is an alexandrian jews in the past who have the name: philo, and he taught numerous false teaching including that the creator of the world is a pair of sophia and logos, and that is why: all follower of philo and sophia pseudo-metaphysics all of them are called as philosopher. And you should not think that the word ‘Logos’ in the book of Gospel of John chapter 1:1 refer to that kind of fake metaphysics based on superstitious gnosticism thinking, and you should not generalize either that the entire Gospel of John were intoxicated by gnosticism, don’t you know that John the apostle literally speaking borrow the word Logos in order he can translate properly the word ‘Memra’ from other book in the Bible, that is in the book of Isaiah 55:10-11, in order you know that Me, Jesus Christ, are the true Logos and the Light from Heaven. And that is why: numerous people and also physicist only love darkness and their attitude is they do not have fear of God, and that is why: they hate the Light. And to all of them who do believe to Me, Jesus Christ, they will not perish but they will have everlasting life. Read again and again and again and again and again the book of Gospel of John 3:16-18.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, Me already help you. love, Jesus Christ

Note: this article is written and dictated by Me, Jesus Christ

url:
http://message.diigo.com/user/guidetorepent
http://Guidetorepent.blogspot.com
http://findtheTruthnow.blogspot.com
http://www.esnips.com/web/Guidetorepent
http://www.esnips.com/web/RepentanceGuide
http://www.facebook.com/guidetorepent
follow Jesus Christ only at http://www.twitter.com/guidetorepent
http://www.facebook.com/VChristianto

endnote:
(a) Quote: ‘…scientific realists. That is to say, not only have they believed that there is such a thing as a real world that is largely independent of how we observe it or conceive of it…’ source: http://www.sfu.ca/philosophy/bradley/anti-realism_in_qm.pdf
(b) Quote: ‘By way of contrast, metaphysical antirealists – like heisenberg, … and the other antirealists listed above – have seen the purpose of science in quite a different way. For them a scientific theory is nothing more than a mathematical model we make to describe our observations, and the question whether the observed phenomena can be explained in terms of underlying substratum of causal mechanisms is meaningless. Since they deny the existence of an independently existing microphysical world, they deny also that there can be any strictly causal or deterministic explanations of what goes on in that world.’ source: http://www.sfu.ca/philosophy/bradley/anti-realism_in_qm.pdf